Legal Opinion

Pokrandt v. Konorski

Cuyahoga Circuit Court

Decided May 8, 1911Published

Error.

1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.

Konorski’s answer and cross-petition directly attacks the validity of the judgment which was obtained by Pokrandt, as administrator, in a previous action in the court of common pleas and upon which the action below was founded. It alleges that in said prior action, after the death of the plaintiff therein and the appointment of Pokrandt as the administrator of his estate, a revivor of the action was held without either the consent of, or notice to, the defendant, as provided by statute, and that subsequently a default judgment was rendered by the court without any jurisdiction of the person…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reynolds v. StansburyOhio Supreme Court · 1851

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API