Legal Opinion
Commission on Human Rights v. State, No. Cv92 070 35 93 (Jan. 12, 1993)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided January 12, 1993No. CV92 070 35 93Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE MOTION TO DISMISS Petitioner seeks money damages and enforcement of an order of the hearing officer1 of the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities (CHRO).
The respondent (DMV) moves to dismiss because (1) as to money damages the doctrine of sovereign immunity protects the respondent; (2) the decision sought to be enforced is not final and; (3) CHRO has not complied with Conn. Gen. Stats.46a-95(b).
Facts
Specifically, on or about November 1, 1985, the DMV, in accordance with the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Fetterman v. University of ConnecticutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Fusco-Amatruda Co. v. Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.