Legal Opinion

Buffalo County v. Hull

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1913No. 17,148Published

Opinion on motion, for rehearing of ease reported in 93 Neb. 586.

1Opinion of the CourtSedgwick, J.

The brief upon the motion for rehearing points out two mistakes in the opinion. 93 Neb. 586.

1. The first one of them is that the opinion says that the bridge was built in 1874, and also says that the act of 1879 was in force when the bridge was built. The point in mind was that the statute of 1881 was treated by Judge Maxwell in the opinion in State v. Kearney County, 12 Neb. 6, as controlling, although it was enacted a long time after the bridge was built; and the opinion in this case is all predicated on the statement therein: “The liability of adjoining counties for repairs of a bridge…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Commissioners of Kearney CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Buffalo County v. HullNebraska Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API