Legal Opinion

Exchange Bank v. Slocumb

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 29, 1965No. 41543Published

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

The special grounds of the motion assign error on the court’s charges to the effect that the burden of proof was on the plaintiff in fi. fa. “In a claim case, where property in the possession of the claimant is levied on under a mortgage fi. fa., the burden is on the plaintiff in fi. fa. to prove his case. . . . However, where the plaintiff offers evidence tending to show that the property levied on was in the possession of the mortgagor at the time of the execution of the mortgage foreclosed, a prima facie case in favor of the plaintiff in fi. fa. is made, and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Allen v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API