State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Kendall
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Townsend, Presiding Judge.
The general demurrer is based on the proposition that the petition, by setting out contradictory statements of the insured, alleges both that she was and that she was not the owner of the vehicle in question, and that, these allegations being inconsistent and repugnant to each other, the conclusion must be reached that she was not the owner and accordingly that there was no’ insurance coverage, citing Adams v. Johnson, 182 Ga. 478, 480 (185 SE 805). The plaintiff, however, alleges the contradictory statements of Mrs. Miller simply for the purpose of building a base…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Adams v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Printup v. Patton & JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Indemnity Co. of America v. PittsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Sconyers v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wright v. NewmanDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
- Wt Harvey Lumber Company v. Jm Wells Lumber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Moore v. Wachovia Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Sunbelt Life Insurance v. Bank of AlapahaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Cowley v. Texas Snubbing Control, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.