Dye v. Dye
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
The solitary question presented for decision is whether or not the permanent alimony awarded to the wife was grossly inadequate. The evidence shows the husband earns a net income of $9,374.43, and the wife earns $3,528. The two had an equity of $4,000 in the home. The wife was awarded all removable furniture except carpets and drapes, an automobile, and $100 per month for six years. Faced with these facts, this court cannot say the award was grossly inadequate. Robertson v. Robertson, 207 Ga. 686 (63 SE2d 876); Thomason v. Thomason, 223 Ga. 90 (153 SE2d 716); McNally…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- McNally v. McNallySupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Childs v. ChildsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Thomason v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bush v. ChappellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Griffin v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Blackwell v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Stynchcombe v. HardySupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Teppenpaw v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.