Legal Opinion

Nathan v. Crouse

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 1913No. 3876PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to La Plata District Court. Hon. Charles A. Pike, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

Plaintiff in error filed his complaint stating two causes of action. The first alleged his ownership of certain real estate in the city of Durango and his right to rents and profits thereof, and that defendant,, used and occupied the same for the period of one year for which she was indebted ,to plaintiff, and demanded judgment for the reasonable value of such use and occupation. *33The second cause of action was for waste committed upon said premises during defendant’s occupancy thereof. To both causes of action defendant pleaded a general denial, and, as to the first, alleged that the real…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thurston v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. McClellan v. HurdSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  3. Limberg v. HigenbothamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  4. Scheffel v. WeilerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  5. Western Book & Stationery Co. v. JevneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lutyen v. RitchieIdaho Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API