Legal Opinion

Tutko v. Banks

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 9, 1964No. 63-878PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant, who was defendant in the trial court, appeals a final judgment in a non jury trial. The appellee is a real estate broker and the judgment was for a commission claimed against the prospective purchaser of a parcel of real estate. The sale was not completed.

There is no dispute as to the following: (1) The plaintiff, appellee, was qualified (2) He performed the services claimed (3) The transaction was not closed because the purchaser, appellant, defaulted in his written agreement to purchase. The basis of the claimed liability of this appellant, purchaser, is the following…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Borinsky v. CohenSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. Peoples Gas System, Inc. v. City Gas Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  3. Spragg v. PolinoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Inleasing Corp. v. JessupSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  2. Frank J. Rooney, Inc. v. Charles W. Ackerman of Fla., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  3. Bruce v. American Development Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Williams v. StewartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. H. I. Resorts, Inc. v. TouchtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API