Hammett v. Lyte Lyne, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Acting Chief Judge.
This is an appeal by Charles Hammett, defendant below, from an order granting the plaintiff a new trial. The order granting the new trial did not give the judge’s reasons therefor. In a series of cases our Supreme Court has held that in the absence of the judge’s reason for granting a new trial, such an order must be reversed, except under certain conditions. See Kent v. Tallahassee Motor Co., 141 Fla. 789, 193 So. 821; Booker v. Saunders Realty Co., Fla.1951, S3 So.2d 912; Ebersole v. Tepperman, Fla.1953, 65 So.2d 564.
In Kent v. Tallahassee Motor Co., supra, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ebersole v. TeppermanSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- City of Miami v. BoppSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- Kent v. Tallahassee Motor Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hammett v. Lyte Lyne, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1963
- State Road Department v. MutilloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963