Legal Opinion

Hammett v. Lyte Lyne, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 15, 1962No. 2894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Acting Chief Judge.

This is an appeal by Charles Hammett, defendant below, from an order granting the plaintiff a new trial. The order granting the new trial did not give the judge’s reasons therefor. In a series of cases our Supreme Court has held that in the absence of the judge’s reason for granting a new trial, such an order must be reversed, except under certain conditions. See Kent v. Tallahassee Motor Co., 141 Fla. 789, 193 So. 821; Booker v. Saunders Realty Co., Fla.1951, S3 So.2d 912; Ebersole v. Tepperman, Fla.1953, 65 So.2d 564.

In Kent v. Tallahassee Motor Co., supra, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ebersole v. TeppermanSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. City of Miami v. BoppSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  3. Kent v. Tallahassee Motor Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hammett v. Lyte Lyne, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1963
  2. State Road Department v. MutilloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API