Legal Opinion

People v. Roman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1994PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant was charged as an accomplice in the sale of drugs based upon the following evidence. During daylight hours an undercover officer approached a man on a Brooklyn street and offered to buy drugs. The man walked a few feet to a car where defendant sat, and defendant passed several packets of heroin to him through the car window. The man then sold one packet to the undercover officer. The People established that defendant and the intermediary had been in the car together shortly before the sale, that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. LiptonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. People v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. People v. HarperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. People v. EspinozaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API