Legal Opinion

National Foundry & Pipe Works v. Oconto Water Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin

Decided October 10, 1892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Equity. Bill by the National Foundry & Pipe Works, Limited, against the Oconto Water Company, S. D. Andrews, W. H. Whitcomb, and others. On motion for receiver and injunction. Granted.

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, District Judge.

The conceded facts upon which the present application for a receiver and for an injunction are based, so far as now necessary to state them, are these: The complainant on the 2d day of January, 1892, recovered judgment in this court in an action at law against the Oconto Water Company for $24,250.04 damages and costs, and, upon return of execution nulla bona, filed this bill against the judgment debtor and others to subject its property to the payment of the judgment. The Oconto Water Company was incorporated under the Revised Statutes of Wisconsin, on the 8th day of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Indianapolis v. Indianapolis Gas-Light & Coke Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. Madison Street Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kemmerer v. St. Louis Blast Furnace Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  2. Mudge v. Black, Sheridan & WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  3. Mowry v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
  4. First Savings & Trust Co. v. Waukesha Canning Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914
  5. Posey v. Town of North BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API