Legal Opinion

Petivan v. City of New Orleans

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 2014No. 2014-CA-0504Published

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL L. DYSART, Judge.

11Arthur Petivan appeals a judgment rendered on a motion for new trial, in which the trial court reversed its previous ruling denying exceptions filed by the City of New Orleans, and maintaining the City’s Exception of Prescription. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

BACKGROUND:

Arthur Petivan owns property at 4131-33 N. Rampart in New Orleans. The property was severely damaged by Hurricane Katrina in 2005. Petivan claims to have made substantial repairs to the property, but despite his best efforts, the City of New Orleans (“City”) levied fines and penalties…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. London Towne Condo. Ass'n v. LONDON TOWNESupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  2. Weber v. Metropolitan Community Hospice Foundation, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. City of New Orleans v. DupartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API