Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Stern v. Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1968No. Nos. 68-234 and 68-245Published

1ConcurrenceTaft, C. J.

I concur in the judgment but for reasons different from those stated in Judge O’Neill’s opinion.

In my opinion, the failure of the notary to sign his name to the jurat on the circulator’s affidavit on one of the petition papers in the instant case, represents a failure to comply with a requirement that has been specified by the General Assembly as a material requirement for a candidate’s petition. This court so held in State, ex rel. Andrews, v. Board of Elections of Medina County (1963), 175 *185Ohio St. 249, 193 N. E. 2d 390, with only one judge dissenting. See also State, ex rel. Allen, v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. State Ex Rel. O'ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State Ex Rel. Kroeger v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State Ex Rel. Lemert v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State ex rel. Cline v. HendersonOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State ex rel. White v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API