O'Bannon v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Chief Judge THOMAS.
OPINION
BYBEE, Circuit Judge:
Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, 15 U.S.C. § 1, prohibits “[e]very contract, combination ..., or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce.” For more than a century, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has prescribed rules governing the eligibility of athletes at its more than 1,000 member colleges and universities. Those rules prohibit student-athletes from being paid for the use of their names, images, and likenesses (NILs). The question presented in this momentous…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Trenton Potteries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Agnew v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Catalano, Inc. v. Target Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Berger v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. AlstonSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- In re Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n Athletic Grant-In-Aid Cap Antitrust Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Brian Bowen, II v. Adidas America Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.