Legal Opinion

Corgan v. Muehling

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 8, 1988No. 86-2202PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scariano

In March of 1979, Penelope Corgan came under the psychological care of Conrad Muehling. She alleges in count I of her complaint that he conducted her treatment negligently, was negligent in having sexual relations with her during this treatment, and “negligently failed either to recognize the evolution of the psychotherapeutic phenomenon of transference and counter-transference or deal appropriately with such evolving phenomenon,” all of which caused her emotional trauma. Corgan contends that Muehling was not registered as a psychologist, but was able to practice psychology by having…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Knierim v. IzzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Borowski v. Von SolbrigIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Rickey v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Jerrie M. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Sawyer Realty Group, Inc. v. Jarvis Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Corgan v. MuehlingIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Martin v. McDonald's Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Doe Ex Rel Roe v. Madison Center HospitalIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Johnson v. Bryco ArmsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API