Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. American Surety Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 25, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

There is no valid defense set up in tbe defendant’s answer. It was given notice of and, by tbe service of a copy of tbe petition and order, made party to tbe proceeding for an accounting. On its own motion said proceeding was dismissed as to this defendant. It bad full knowledge of tbe proceedings and an opportunity to appear and defend. It elected not to do so. It cannot now complain tbat judgment was rendered against tbe principal in tbe bond, to which tbe principal did not except and from which be did not appeal.

Tbe amount due by tbe former guardian having been duly ascertained, bis…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Thornton v. BarbourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. State Ex Rel. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. STATE EX REL. DUCKETT v. PetteeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Morgan v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Morgan v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API