Moran v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant below was indicted and convicted for assault with intent to rape.
He interposed a dual defense of not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity.
The prime factual inquiry centers around the contention of the accused that he was too drunk to form any intent to commit the crime. In support of this claim he testified that during a period from about an hour before until at least this long after the time fixed for the commission of the offense, he was intoxicated to the extent that he was completely "blacked out" mentally. In other words, according to his testimony, he had no…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Parsons v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Granberry v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
- Whitten v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
3Cited by17 opinions
- Coon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- Hutcherson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- Fletcher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Pilley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Little Caesar's, Inc. v. ALA. ALCOHOLIC BEV. CON. BD.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.