Legal Opinion

Dickens v. Barnham

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 8, 1920No. 9898PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Action against parents and child for personal injuries resulting from the latter’s use of a deadly weapon. Judgment for plaintiff. On Application for Supersedeas. Error to the District Court of Boulder County, Hon. George H. Bradfield, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from the alleged negligence of the defendants Lloyd Dickens, a minor, and William A. Dickens and Hannah 'Dickens, the parents of Lloyd Dicken^. The plaintiff below recovered a judgment against two of the defendants, the father and the son, and such defendants have sued out this writ of error and apply for a supersedeas.

The plaintiff, Henry E. Barnham, was injured by a flying bullet, alleged to have been discharged from a rifle fired by the defendant Lloyd Dickens, who was at that time an infant of the age of eight years. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Salisbury v. CrudaleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1918

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Farmers Group, Inc. v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Casebolt ex rel. Casebolt v. CowanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Rubin v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Orville Douglass and Wilma Douglass v. Hartford Insurance Company, a Connecticut Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API