Legal Opinion
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. v. Vigilant Insurance Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 17, 2017PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Charles E. Ramos, J.
In this insurance coverage action, plaintiffs1 (together, plaintiffs) seek a declaration that its insurers are required to indemnify it for claims stemming from Bear Stearns’ monetary settlement of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) investigations and related private litigation arising out of Bear Stearns’ alleged facilitation of late trading and deceptive market timing.
In motion sequence 018, defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P.A. (National Union) moves for partial summary judgment…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Public Service Mutual Insurance v. GoldfarbNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Town of Massena v. Healthcare Underwriters Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Pioneer Tower Owners Association v. STATE FARM & CASUALTY COMPANYNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. v. Vigilant InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- Levitt v. J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Catlin Specialty Ins. Co. v. J.J. White, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- J.P. Morgan Sec., Inc. v. Vigilant Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- J.P. Morgan Sec., Inc. v. Vigilant Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- ChemTreat, Inc. v. Beazley Furlonge LimitedDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020