Legal Opinion

Trizna & Lepri v. Malcolm (In Re Malcolm)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 22, 1992No. 19-04915PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

EUGENE R. WEDOFF, Bankruptcy Judge.

Plaintiff, Trizna & Lepri, an Illinois general partnership engaged in the practice of law, instituted this Chapter 7 adversary proceeding against Debtors/Defendants Lloyd and Delores Malcolm (“the debtors”) to obtain a determination of the discharge-ability of a debt under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A). The principal issues raised by the proceeding are whether the debtors’ failure to provide notice of their bankruptcy filing constitutes a false representation under Section 523(a)(2)(A) and whether the plaintiff met its burden of proving actual…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Neal v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. In Re Amjad I. Eashai, Debtor. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Amjad I. EashaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Merchants National Bank of Winona v. Moen (In Re Moen)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  3. Banner Oil Co. v. Bryson (In Re Bryson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  4. Deady v. Hanson (In Re Hanson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  5. Old Republic National Title v. LevasseurCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API