Legal Opinion

Richard v. Richard

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 6, 1973No. 19-72PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The question before us has been certified to us by the presiding judge of the Franklin County Court, under the provisions of Rule 5(b) of the Vermont Rules of Appellate Procedure appealing the Amended Order of Superior Judge Stephen B. Martin, dated February 4, 1972.

The question certified is:

“Whether a wife can sue her husband for personal injuries received by her during her marriage while riding as a guest in an automobile operated by her husband by reason of his alleged negligence.”

The factual situation is simple. On November 14, 1970, in St. Albans, Vermont, plaintiff, during her marriage…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. CulverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Rains v. RainsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  3. Courtney v. CourtneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Porter v. Bank of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
  5. Rubalcava v. GissemanUtah Supreme Court · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Merenoff v. MerenoffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  2. Hay v. Medical Center Hosp. of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  3. Boblitz v. BoblitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Coffindaffer v. CoffindafferWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API