Legal Opinion

Barth v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 23, 2018No. 17-1037Published

1Opinion of the Court

t; ii i"li rt F ii'!15 ",;"5;tt llntfu @nite! btstts @ourt otfelerul @tufms No. l7-1037L FILED (Filed: March 23,2018) MAR 2 3 2018 ) #3;3^""31?fi. JOHN S. BARTH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Motion to Dismiss; Lack of Subject Matter ) Jurisdiction; RCFC l2(bXl); ) RCFC l2(bX6);RcFc l2(h)(3). THE LINITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ) John S. Barth, Springvale, ME, pro se. Aaron E. Woodward, Trial Attomey, with whom were Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Robert E. Kirschman. Jr., Director, L. Misha Preheim, Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API