Legal Opinion

Anderson-McGriff Co. v. Meisel

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 4, 1951No. 33784, 33785PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

1. Ground 10 of the amended motion for a new trial complains that the trial judge erred, when charging on § 88-808 of the Atlanta City Code, which reads in part: “In places where, and at such hours as, stopping for the loading or unloading of - merchandise or materials is permitted, vehicles used for the transportation of merchandise or materials may be backed into the curb to take on or discharge loads”, in that he charged that the permission mentioned in such ordinance meant the official permission of the City of Atlanta. The charge was not error. Section 88-807 of the Atlanta City Code…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Williams v. GrierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Gillespie v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Kleinberg v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  5. Bozeman v. Blue's Truck Line Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cooper v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  2. Landers v. French's Ice Cream Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. Allen Williams B/n/f Louise J. Smyre v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  4. Perry v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. Medlin v. BickfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API