Legal Opinion

Shotwell v. Bultman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1942No. Docket No. 45, Calendar No. 42,135PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiff, Alvaro F. Shotwéll, on behalf of himself and as assignee of his wife, brought this action against defendant and cross plaintiff, John H. Bultman, for damages resulting from an automobile collision- at the intersection of Elliott street, Silver avenue, and the double tracks of the Pere Marquette railroad in the city of Grand Rapids at about 8:30 a.m., September 1,1941.

Silver avenue, south of Elliott, is an unimproved street 60 feet wide running north and south. Elliott is a 66-foot street running east and west with a 30-foot pavement in the center. Neither street is protected by a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sonfilian v. WiedmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Cline v. KillingbeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Taylor v. WilliamsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shoemaker v. TrompenMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API