Legal Opinion

Uptown National Bank v. Puris

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1959No. 35389PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daily

This is an appeal from a judgment enteréd by the municipal court of Chicago in a garnishment proceeding which had its origin when appellant, the State Bank of St. Charles, financed, repossessed and sold an automobile which had already been financed by appellee, the Uptown National Bank of Chicago, whose interest was secured by a judgment note and chattel mortgage. Jurisdiction of this court upon direct appeal is apparently sought to be sustained on the ground that the validity of article II of chapter 3 of the Motor Vehicle Law is involved. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1957, chap. 95½, pars. 3 — 201 to 3…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leffler v. BrowningIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Village of Lansing v. HackerIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Layton v. LaytonIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Hackner v. Van WyckIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Northwestern Institute of Foot Surgery & Chiropody v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. BarthIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Ferguson v. Riverside Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  3. City of Chicago v. ShayneIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. BarthIllinois Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API