Legal Opinion

Ankeny Community School District v. Van Gorp

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 16, 1993No. 92-529PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

Plaintiff school contracted with defendant Municipal Supply, Inc. for the purchase and installation of a water conditioner. After the conditioner was installed Municipal Supply billed the school for the unit, its installation, various fittings, and materials in a total amount of $10,749.80. The school did not pay because it received a second bill from defendant Don Van Gorp *507who also claimed he was entitled to be paid for the conditioner.

Sometime thereafter Van Gorp removed the conditioner without consulting with or obtaining permission from the school. It is said the removal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rick v. BoegelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  2. Barry v. State Surety CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  3. Marx Truck Line, Inc. v. FredricksenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. Flickinger v. Mark IV Apartments, Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roush v. Mahaska State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. Leah N. Hinderks, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Larry H. Hinderks, and Core Business Leasing LLC, Russell Naden F/D/B/A Naden Industries, and Custom Applications Ag, LLC v. Luella E. Hinderks and Wade HinderksCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2016
  3. Roush v. Mahaska State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Tedrow v. ThickeCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API