Legal Opinion
In Re Duncan & Forbes Development, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California
Decided April 6, 2006No. LA 06 16050 SBPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order Denying Relief from Stay on § 362(d)(4) Grounds
SAMUEL L. BUFFORD, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. Introduction
Creditor Sunset Partner, L.P. (“Sunset”) brings this motion for relief from automatic stay with respect to real property belonging to debtor Duncan & Forbes Development, Inc. (“D & F”). The court denies Sunset’s motion insofar as, based on § 362(d)(4), 1 it is grounded on a scheme to delay, hinder, and defraud Sunset through a transfer of the subject property without Sunset’s consent. Alternatively, the court has granted an order lifting the stay for “cause” pursuant to § 362(d)(1). Thus,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Asgrow Seed Co. v. WinterboerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Dean v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Van Iderstine v. National Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Sargent v. BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Tronox Inc. v. Kerr McGee Corp. (In re Tronox Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- In re Everton Aloysius SterlingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- In Re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- In Re WilkeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- In re JCP Properties, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.