Boshell v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
Plaintiff’s colt was killed by defendant’s train, and she sues to recover for its loss. The cause was tried before the court without a jury on oral proof, resulting in a judgment for defendant. The finding of the trial judge on the facts, therefore, is to be accorded the weight of a jury verdict. Yancey v. Denham, 211 Ala. 138, 99 So. 851; McNaron v. McNaron, 210 Ala. 687, 99 So. 116.
The witnesses for plaintiff established the fact the colt was killed by defendant’s train, and this sufficed to shift the burden to defendant to show that the killing was not negligently done. Louisville & N. R.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Southern Ry. Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Southern Ry. Co. v. WyleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. CoxeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- McNaron v. McNaronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. SellersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931