Christopher Jones v. Emily Sanders, ET AL.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER JONES PLAINTIFF V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:21-CV-30-CWR-ASH EMILY SANDERS, ET AL. DEFENDANTS ORDER Pro se Plaintiff Christopher Jones is again before the Court with a Supplement to Motion to Reopen Case [210] and a Motion to Substitute Parties [211]. As explained below, Jones’s motion to reopen is denied because he has again failed to attach competent evidence—such as an affidavit or a declaration under penalty of perjury—supporting his assertion that the settlement agreement was breached. And the motion to…