Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Cotter v. Leipner

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 30, 1951PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.

This action is brought to determine the title to the office of judge of the City Court of Bridgeport.

The following facts have been stipulated: The terms of office of the defendants’ immediate predecessors (who, as it happens, were the present plaintiffs) expired under the law as it then was on June 30, 1949. The General Assembly having failed to appoint successors, there were vacancies in the office for the term commencing July 1, 1949. The governor, after the General Assembly adjourned, acting under the authority of § 92 of the General Statutes, appointed the defendants to fill those…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. State ex rel. Hudd v. TimmeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Williams v. Mayor of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Woodworth v. BowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  5. Ex parte WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stolberg v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Jones v. LockhartArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State v. SanabriaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. Barlow v. KaminskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  5. Page v. Welfare CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API