Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. General Realty Service, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 7, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs, mortgagees, after a default in a semiannual payment of interest by the mortgagor, seek to foreclose a mortgage which contained the following clause: “The said mortgagees, their heirs, executors, administrators or assigns shall release from the hen of this mortgage, any lot on payment of the sum of $450.00.” The mortgage originally covered one hundred and forty-five lots. Prior to default twenty-two lots had been released and the proceeds applied upon the mortgage debt. Of the remaining lots the mortgagor had prior to default deeded five to purchasers, taking back in the case of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Graf v. Hope Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Werner v. . TuchNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Fulton v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reilly v. City Deposit Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Clason's Point Land Co. v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  3. Columbia Development, Inc. v. WatchieOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Harris County Houston Ship Channel Nav. Dist. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Lamparelli Construction Co. v. Berkley Square of Hamburg, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API