Legal Opinion

People v. Murphy

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1998No. B105405, B110682PublishedCited by 14 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.—. . . . . . . . *

Facts and Proceedings Below: People’s Appeal

The People appeal from the sentence imposed on defendant under the one strike law (Pen. Code, § 667.61). * 11 We conclude that in sentencing a defendant convicted of committing violent sex offenses against different victims on different occasions the one strike law requires the trial court to impose one indeterminate life term per victim per occasion. Thereafter, the court should follow the normal sentencing rules in imposing sentence on offenses committed against each victim in addition to the offense for which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. GarnicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. People v. ValdezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. People v. Morales, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API