Estep v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge. —

Appellant’s motion is in the main too general to demand attention. Jordan v. State, 64 Tex. Crim. Rep. 187, 141 S. W. 792; Cooper v. State, 98 Tex. Crim. Rep. 446, 265 S. W. 894; Grant v. State, 287 S. W. 254. Upon his insistence that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction we have again carefully reviewed the facts and find ourselves unable to agree with his contention.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

Overruled.