Legal Opinion

James L. Harper v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 3, 2014No. 4D13-1935 and 4D13-1936Published

1Per curiam

We reverse the denial of appellant’s motion, filed before sentencing, to withdraw his pleas pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(f). There was no meeting of the minds as to the length of time appellant had to perform under a substantial assistance agreement and his efforts were shut down by the supervising detective after only 16 or 17 days. See Arzola v. State, 994 So.2d 1209 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008); Timothee v. State, 721 So.2d 776 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Pate v. State, 547 So.2d 316 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Elias v. State, 531 So.2d 418 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Soto v. State, 515 So.2d…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Elias v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Timothee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Pate v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Arzola v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  5. Soto v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API