Legal Opinion

Seymore v. Metson Marine, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 14, 2011No. A127489PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POLLAK, Acting P. J.

Plaintiffs Andrew Seymore and Kenneth Blonden appeal from a judgment entered in favor of their former employers, defendants Metson Marine, Inc., and Metson Offshore, Inc. (collectively Metson), on their complaint seeking to recover unpaid overtime wages. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Metson on the ground that Metson’s compensation practices comply with the requirements of the Labor Code. When employed by defendants, plaintiffs worked consecutive 14-day “hitches” on Metson’s ships, providing emergency cleanup of oil spills and other…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Morillion v. Royal Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In Re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Wage & Hour LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
  5. Bell v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Mendiola v. CPS Security Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Vranish v. Exxon Mobil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Kerbes v. Raceway Associates, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  5. Abshire v. Redland Energy Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API