Mangrum v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Appellant was convicted under an indictment charging him with being an accessory after the fact to making intoxicating liquor, the crime' of making liquor having been committed by one Linzy Gyngard.
It is suggested by the State that none of the alleged errors assigned for the reversal of the judgment appear upon the face of the record, and that, as the bill of exceptions was not filed within the fifty-five days allowed by the court for that purpose, there are no questions presented for our review.
The judgment overruling the motion for a new trial and sentencing the defendant was entered on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Prewitt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Murchison v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Stevens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923