Webb v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1ConcurrenceJohn A. Fogleman, Justice
I concur in the result because a timely objection was not made. As I understand the record, no objection was registered until the court, parties, attorneys and witnesses had reached the residence of the witness. I agree that a criminal should not be permitted to take advantage of his own wrong. The real issue in this case was whether defendant was the criminal. The state’s attorney stated that the witness had identified the defendant in at least one judicial proceeding as the perpetrator of the crime, that the witness had been struck one time and, at the time of trial, was totally…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TrinkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Cranford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Kagen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960