Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Webb v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 20, 1972No. 5776Published

1ConcurrenceJohn A. Fogleman, Justice

I concur in the result because a timely objection was not made. As I understand the record, no objection was registered until the court, parties, attorneys and witnesses had reached the residence of the witness. I agree that a criminal should not be permitted to take advantage of his own wrong. The real issue in this case was whether defendant was the criminal. The state’s attorney stated that the witness had identified the defendant in at least one judicial proceeding as the perpetrator of the crime, that the witness had been struck one time and, at the time of trial, was totally…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TrinkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  3. Cranford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  4. Kagen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API