Legal Opinion
Acosta v. B & B Oilfield Services, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 6, 2012No. 12-122PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GENOVESE, Judge.
| ,In this revocatory action, Wilson Acosta appeals the trial court’s award of sanctions in the amount of $7,500.00 in attorney fees plus expenses of $65.04 in favor of R & T Oilfield Services, Inc. (R & T) f/k/a B & B Oilfield Services, Inc. (B & B, Inc.).1 R & T answered the appeal seeking an increase in the amount of sanctions awarded by the trial court and an additional amount of sanctions for the filing of a frivolous appeal. For the reasons that follow, we affirm and render.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The instant matter instituted by Mr. Acosta is predicated on an action…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Copenhaver v. John Bonura & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Tillmon v. Thrasher WaterproofingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Slaughter v. Board of Supervisors of Southern University & Agricultural & Mechanical CollegeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Connelly v. LeeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Bandaries v. CassidyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- David v. DavidLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Blanchet v. BoudreauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Molinere v. LapeyrouseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- David v. DavidLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Deal v. HaneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.