United States v. Adigun
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, Chief Judge.
Presently before the court is convicted defendant Olufemi Adigun’s (“Adigun”) amended motion (Doc. 221) for a new trial. Adigun asserts that a new trial is warranted because (1) the court erred in denying Adigun’s objection under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986); (2) the court erred in denying Adigun’s request for a “missing witness” instruction; and (3) the jury’s verdict was against the weight of the evidence. For the following reasons, the court will deny the motion.
I. Background
The government’s prosecution…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.