Legal Opinion
De La Cruz v. Quackenbush
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 10, 2000No. B130093PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
California’s Insurance Commissioner appeals from a judgment holding he cannot revoke an insurance broker’s license for refusing to permit a warrantless search of the books and records the broker is required by law to maintain. We affirm.
Facts and Proceedings Below
The facts are not in dispute.
The California Department of Insurance received an anonymous complaint alleging certain insurance agencies in the Los Angeles area were selling insurance through unlicensed agents. The department began an inquiry which eventually led it to the office of Jose De La Cruz, a licensed broker.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Vacaville v. PitamberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Lewis v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Sue v. The Monsoon Blue CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2016