Legal Opinion
In re Enable Commerce, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided March 10, 2009No. Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-1972-DPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SIDNEY A. FITZWATER, Chief Judge.
The instant motion to remand presents the question whether this Tex.R. Civ. P. 202 proceeding — which allows a person to petition a Texas court for authorization to take depositions before suit to perpetuate or obtain testimony for use in an anticipated suit or to investigate a potential claim or suit — is removable under the court’s diversity jurisdiction. Concluding that it is not, the court grants petitioner’s motion and remands this matter to state court.
I
Petitioner Enable Commerce, Inc. (“Enable”) filed in Texas state court a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Acuna v. Brown & Root Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Howery v. Allstate Ins CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pesole v. Health Care Service Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2017
- Gromer v. MacKDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2011
- HMC RFG Investors LLC v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024
- Highland Capital Management, L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
- Jet Homeloans Ventures LLC v. PrimeLending Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.