Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Saccol

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1989No. 266PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from the lower court’s order granting a new trial for defendant/appellee. The issue to be decided is whether, in a prosecution under the Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act (hereinafter “the Act”),1 the Commonwealth or the defendant has the burden to prove the presence or lack of authority or consent to intercept and disclose information derived from a wiretapping or electronic surveillance operation.

The appellee in this case was charged with three violations under § 5703 of the Act2 for unlawfully intercepting a wire…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McKelvey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Commonwealth v. IlgenfritzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. McNeilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. BigelowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Margiotti v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RishelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. BarnesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. ShafferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API