Legal Opinion

Toltec Ranch Co. v. Babcock

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 21, 1903No. 49PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP UTAH. The facts are stated in the opimon.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna

Plaintiff in error is a corporation, and brought this action in 1899 in the District Court of the First Judicial District of the State of Utah, county of Box Elder, for the recovery of the' possession of sixty-four acres of land in section 17, township 11, north of range 2 west. The plaintiff alleged title in fee. The answer alleged that defendant, William Babcock, held the land as agent of his wife Louisa Babcock, who settled upon it as a homesteader, having the qualifications thereof, in 1867, erected improvements of the value of $1500, and that the land was reserved from .the grant of the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alco Parking Corp. v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Rodgers v. CarpenterNevada Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API