Commonwealth v. Markle
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MONTEMURO, Judge:
This case comes before us on a consolidation of three appeals. The Commonwealth appeals from the Order of the Post-Conviction Hearing Act 1 (“PCHA”) Court granting Joseph Markle (designated as appellee herein) the right to file a direct appeal nunc pro tunc. Appellee appeals nunc pro tunc from the trial court’s judgment of concurrent sentences following a jury trial where appellee was found guilty of burglary 2 and conspiracy. 3 He also appeals from the PCHA Court’s denial of his other grounds for PCHA relief. We affirm.
On June 25, 1981 a Philadelphia police officer,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PettusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. WebsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Com. v. Prater, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Commonwealth v. DouglasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. DouglasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.