Legal Opinion

Lobo v. Soto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 25, 2010PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), entered June 15, 2009, which denied their motion, inter alia,, for a judgment of foreclosure and sale on the ground that they failed to serve the court-appointed referee with the motion in strict compliance with the order to show cause.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

“ ‘The method of service provided for in an order to show *1136cause is jurisdictional in nature and must be strictly complied with’ ” (City of New York v Miller, 72 AD3d 726…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hennessey v. DiCarloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. MATTER OF MASTER v. PohankaNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. El Greco Society of Visual Arts, Inc. v. DiamantidisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Del Villar v. VekiarelisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Best Batchateu v. PetersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Codrington v. Citimortgage, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Codrington v. Citimortgage, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Khan v. KhanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  5. Siracusa v. City Ice Pavillion, LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API