Legal Opinion

Feinstein v. . Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment entered July 16, 1918, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict and directing a dismissal of the complaint. The action was to recover on a policy of burglary insurance.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment entered July 16, 1918, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict and directing a dismissal of the complaint. The action was to recover on a policy of burglary insurance. The answer set up as separate defenses: 1. That there was a breach of warranty on the part of the plaintiffs in that the premises were not solely occupied by plaintiffs at the time of the alleged loss, and that there was a violation of the terms and conditions of the policy by reason of…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur; His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Marino v. SardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  2. Justry v. Northern InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API