Legal Opinion

United States v. Duran

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 5, 1995No. Crim. 94-447 (CRR)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

INTRODUCTION

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

Before the Court are the Defendant’s Motion to Bifurcate Trial and the Government’s Opposition thereto. The Court held a hearing on said Motion on February 27, 1995. Upon careful consideration of the parties’ briefs, the oral argument of counsel, and the entire record herein, the Court finds that the Defendant’s Motion to Bifurcate Trial shall be denied.

In his Motion, the Defendant requests that the Court bifurcate the trial such that (1) the jury first decides whether the prosecution has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Shannon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. The Washington Post v. Honorable Deborah RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Lavance Greene, United States of America v. Randolph GreeneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Francisco Martin DuranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API