Rogers v. Druffel
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Nineteenth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The plaintiff had judgment and the defendant appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court:
Action to quiet title to a lot in the City of San Francisco. Both parties claim this under John G. Gimmy. The plain*655tiff’s deraignment of title is as follows: In an action for divorce brought by Anna M. Gimmy against John G. Gimmy, a judgement was rendered April 1st, 1861, in favor of Anna against John G. Gimmy, for a divorce and for the recovery of one hundred dollars, counsel fees and her costs taxed at four hundred and twenty-two dollars, and the judgment was duly docketed. In May, 1861, an execution was issued on that judgment, and under it the Sheriff sold the property, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bagley v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sanders v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Newell v. DartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Beaton v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Miller Co. v. MeloneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
- Spicer v. . GambillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.