Legal Opinion

Englert v. First Nat. Bank at Pbgh.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1939No. Appeals, 47 and 52PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinión by

Me. Justice Linn,

The appeal at No. 47 is from a decree setting aside a sale of collateral made by defendant bank to itself. The appellee-plaintiff * has fairly stated the question for review: “Did the acts of the pledgee bank, as shown by the evidence, by which it claims that it acquired absolute title to the pledged securities, constitute a ‘private sale’ of the securities within the meaning of the collateral note?”

April 1, 1932, defendant loaned Milton S. Englert $120,000 on his collateral demand note. The security consisted of stocks and bonds delivered to defendant in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hiscock v. Varick Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Colonial Trust Co. v. Central Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  3. Appeal of JeanesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  4. Huntingdon Valley Trust Co. v. Norristown-Penn Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Plucker v. TellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Waters Admr.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. In re StarksDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API