Legal Opinion

State Budget Comm. v. Adams, County Judge

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 9, 1933PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OpiNion op the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Affirm-

ing.

This is a suit under the Declaratory Judgment Act (Civil Code of Practice secs. 639a-l to 639a-12) to determine the constitutionality of chapter 24 of the Acts ■of 1932, known as the Uniform County Budget Act, and, if constitutional, whether or not it is operative. The .lower court held the act constitutional and operative, and, from that judgment, this appeal is prosecuted.

The act in question is a very comprehensive one. Among other things, it provides that a county budget ■commission shall be established in each of the counties •of this state.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. South v. FishCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Wiemer v. Comr's Sinking FundCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  4. Naylor v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  5. Hendrickson v. Taylor County Farm BureauCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pressman v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Johnson v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  3. City of Bowling Green v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
  4. Kentucky Utilities Co. v. Board of Com'rs of ParisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  5. Booth v. City of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API